立場新聞 2015/07/20 12:41
"I do feel that what those students and young people did was show a huge respect for Hong Kong and its future. Whether or not I want to make a film about this happening – if I answer from my heart then yes, I would say I would definitely want to, in the same way that I would really love to make the third part of the Election trilogy. However, if we had to do this right now, right in this moment, I think it would have some sort of consequences for my company.”
(我認為學生與年輕人所做的,展現出對香港及香港未來的尊重。至於我想不想為此拍一部電影,我心裏很想,我非常想,我也想開拍《黑社會》第三部。不過,如果我當下這麼做,我想會為我的公司帶來一些後果。)
"This story and this moral element of what happened during the Umbrella Revolution and what it means for Hong Kong will always be in my head, will always be in my memory and my imagination, and it will definitely appear in my films in the future."
(雨傘革命與當中的道德情操,以及它對香港的意義,將長存於我的腦海、我的記憶、我的想像之中,它一定會在我將來的作品中出現。)
“If you just make them for the Hong Kong audience you have to make a small film. To the extent that if you want to make a film in China there are investors who are willing to pay…” The interpreter stalls him, confirms the figure, utters a pronounced“wow”and continues. “…100,000,000 HKD (well over eight million Sterling) to make one film, whereas in Hong Kong you can't even get an investor for 10 million HKD.”
"In terms of cinema, how is China influencing Hong Kong?”he continues, flowing more freely on the political than the personal earlier on in our interview. “I think the biggest problem is that you are seeing less and less free Hong Kong cinema. You cannot make a film in China and be completely free. You can still do it in Hong Kong but you can't in China. At the minute Hong Kong cinema is still completely free and you have artistic license to do what you want. But the news already, a lot of it is false and no longer [contains] freedom of speech, it is completely whatever they want to tell you.”